Taiwan
The 11th Legislative Yuan as its own publisher records it: 113 sitting members and 10 who have left, 130,806 individual ballots, and 22 county and city heads. Certified against the live publisher on 2026-09-07; travel and geography as of 2026-09-07.
Strait Watch
PLA activity around Taiwan, as the Ministry of National Defense reports it daily
2026-07-23 → 2026-09-20 · 60 daysReviewed evidence · 41
Each record is the monitor’s own bilingual summary of a source it read, with the source linked. A repeated report of the same episode is not a second episode.
- 2026-09-20/2026-09-22Matsucivilian_transportofficial claimMatsu notices schedule evening and inter-island services馬祖公告排定夜航及島際航班
September20 notices schedule New Taima and Taima Star evening sailings, following yesterday’s provisional outlook. A separate notice schedules Nangan–Dongyin service on September21–22. September21 evening service remains subject to weather and the following morning’s decision. These notices establish scheduled availability, not completed voyages; no military closure is stated.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-19T06:00:00+08:00/2026-09-20T06:00:00+08:00Taiwandaily_aggregate_followupofficial claimAircraft sorties fall again; naval count steady for a second day共機架次再降;共艦數連兩日持平
MND reports 5 aircraft sorties, 11 naval vessels and 6 other official ships, with all 5 sorties in its median-line/ADIZ subset. Aircraft fell 28→20→5 over three reporting days; naval vessels stayed at 11 for two days and other official ships rose 3→6. These figures do not measure airlift, unique fleets or territorial-airspace violations. Direct MND TLS failure continues. Official mirrors confirm counts; the Air Force end date is misprinted as September18, while the main MND indexed original and September20 MNA item support the September19–20 window.
sourcevia mnd - 2026-09-19/2026-09-20Matsucivilian_transportofficial claimMatsu ferry scheduled; next-day service subject to weather馬祖客輪排定開航;翌日航班仍須視天候確認
The September 19 notice schedules New Taima service between Keelung, Nangan and Dongyin. September 20 evening service is provisionally expected, subject to the next morning’s announcement and changing sea conditions. A timetable is not confirmation the voyage operated. No military restriction is stated in this notice.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-18T06:00:00+08:00/2026-09-19T06:00:00+08:00Taiwandaily_aggregate_followupofficial claimAircraft count eases; one-day naval increase共機架次回落;共艦單日增加
MND reports 20 aircraft sorties, 11 naval ships and 3 other official ships; 13 sorties in the median-line/ADIZ subset. Aircraft fell from 28; naval ships rose from 7. This follows the September 18 alert, with no new sustained naval increase established. Direct MND collection failed TLS. Official Air Force and MNA fallback pages confirm counts; MND indexed original resolves the Air Force mirror’s duplicated September 18 end date. These are the same official claim, not independent detections or territorial-airspace violations.
sourcevia mnd - 2026-09-18/2026-09-20 scheduled serviceMatsucivilian_transportattributed reportSeptember 18 Matsu sailing announced; weekend service scheduled九月十八日馬祖航班公告開航,週末短程班表發布
The operator notice carried by Matsu Daily confirms a scheduled New Taima departure from Keelung at 22:30 on September 18, resolving yesterday’s provisional decision. Nanbei Star 2 is scheduled for Nangan–Dongyin on September 19 and the return on September 20. September 19 evening long-route service remains provisional until that morning’s announcement. Announced schedules do not prove completed voyages; these notices do not attribute disruptions to military action.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-18 visit; construction proposed for 2028–2032Matsucapacity_planofficial claimMatsu Coast Guard facility proposal is future capacity馬祖海巡廳舍規劃屬未來建設
CGA reports the premier’s September 18 Matsu visit to review a proposed NT$735 million coast-patrol/Fuao inspection facility. Approval is expected in 2026, construction in 2028 and completion in 2032, with space for about 190 personnel. These are planned dates and capacity, not a current deployment increase. General references to Chinese Coast Guard pressure do not describe a new dated incursion.
sourcevia cga_islands - Three-day exercise ending2026-09-18; presidential visit2026-09-18Taiwantaiwan_exerciseattributed reportTaiwan reports integrating attack drones into its joint live-fire exercise台灣通報將攻擊無人機納入聯合實彈演練
CNA, citing a Presidential Office release, reports that President Lai inspected Taiwan’s three-day joint precision-missile exercise in Pingtung on September 18 and described the first integration of multiple attack-drone types. Record this as Taiwan training and attributed capability development. Its coincidence with rising PLA sorties does not establish causation or prove PRC mobilization; CNA and official material quoted within it are not independent corroboration.
sourcevia cna - 2026-09-17 from 08:45 UTC+8; end unspecifiedTaiwanjoint_patrolofficial claimMND reports a separate September 17 joint patrol after the daily cutoff國防部另通報九月十七日每日統計截止後的聯合警巡
MND, through its Military News Agency, reports 19 aircraft sorties from 08:45 Taiwan time, including 15 crossing the median line into southwestern and central airspace in coordination with naval vessels. The mix includes combat, support and unmanned aircraft; Y-8 electronic-warfare aircraft are not an airlift count. This partial-day event follows the separate 24-hour report ending at 06:00 (19 sorties, 17 median-line/ADIZ subset). Keep the windows separate; do not add this event to the daily series or a later daily total. No territorial-airspace violation or mainland buildup is established.
sourcevia mnd - 2026-09-16/2026-09-18 scheduled services; tidal timetable changes through 2026-10-09Matsucivilian_transportattributed reportMatsu ferry schedules resume; Langqi changes attributed to tides馬祖渡輪公告開航;琅岐時刻調整歸因潮汐
Matsu Daily carries New Taima sailing notices for September 16 and 17 after earlier weather and maintenance disruption, plus Nanbei Star 2 service on September 17–18. These are schedules, not proof of completed voyages. The September 18 evening long route remains provisional pending that morning’s decision. Separate operator notices adjust Fuao–Langqi departures during September 16–30 and October 2–9 because low tidal water levels affect Langqi port; no military cause is stated. Exact revised times are in notice images and were not transcribed.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-16Matsucivil_transportattributed reportMatsu: Taima Star sailing announced; maintenance and weather remain separate馬祖:臺馬之星公告開航,保養與海象分列
The September 15 notice schedules Taima Star’s evening departure from Keelung via Nangan and Dongyin back to Nangan, without a return to Keelung. This resolves the prior provisional sailing announcement, but does not verify a completed voyage. New Taima’s September 15 trip is suspended for maintenance; September 16 evening service is still provisional. Nangan–Daqiu’s September 16 service is cancelled for sea conditions. No military cause is stated.
sourcevia matsu_transport - as of 2026-09-14Mainlandcapability_constructionattributed reportAnalyst identifies possible submarine-drone support ship under construction分析者研判在建船舶可能支援無人潛航器
H I Sutton reports reviewing satellite images and interprets a ship under construction as a possible submarine-drone mothership. Its proposed role and capacity remain analyst assessments. Construction evidence does not establish operational readiness, deployment toward Taiwan or amphibious troop transport. ISW’s September 18 update repeats this assessment; this monitor has not independently analyzed the imagery.
sourcevia naval_news - Daily windows ending 2026-09-14/2026-09-18 at 06:00 UTC+8Taiwanaggregate_trendderived analysisAircraft activity continues rising; maritime counts do not show the same increase共機活動持續增加;船艦數量未呈現同幅上升
MND reports 28 aircraft sorties, 7 naval ships and 2 other official ships for the window ending September 18 at 06:00, including a 24-sortie median-line/ADIZ subset. Daily sorties rose 4→8→15→19→28 across five reporting dates. The seven-day mean is 12.29 against 4.68 in the preceding 28 days (2.63×); naval means are 6.71 versus 7.43. This warrants a notice of sustained short-term air activity, not an invasion forecast. Yesterday’s 19-sortie partial patrol falls inside this full-day window and is not added again. These are official detections, not unique aircraft, airlift totals or territorial-airspace violation counts.
sourcevia mnd - 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-16Matsucivil_transportattributed reportMatsu: weather cancellation confirmed; substitute service announced馬祖:確認海象停航,另公告替代航班
Operator notices confirm New Taima’s September 14 outbound and September 15 return are cancelled for sea conditions, resolving yesterday’s uncertainty. Nanbei Star 2’s September 15–16 trip is also cancelled. Donghai Mingzhu announces an added Nangan–Dongyin trip for September 14–15. September 15 New Taima maintenance is a separate cause; a possible Taima Star evening sailing remains provisional. Announcements do not prove completed voyages. No military cause is stated.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-14Matsucivil_transportattributed reportMatsu ferries: announced sailings and further sea-condition uncertainty馬祖航運:公告開航,後續仍受海象影響
Matsu Daily carries notices for September 13 evening New Taima and Taima Star sailings, plus September 13–14 Nangan–Dongyin service. These are schedules, not confirmation of completed voyages. The September 14 evening long-distance service may be cancelled, pending that morning’s decision because of forecast sea conditions. Nangan–Daqiu is cancelled September 14 because tides hinder docking. No military cause is stated.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-11KinmenCoast guardofficial claimCGA reports another Kinmen episode, continuing the previously flagged pattern海巡再通報金門事件,延續先前關注的模式
Taiwan’s Coast Guard says the same four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen restricted waters on September 11 and all subsequently left. It calls this the fourth episode of the week and the second consecutive day. Together with September 8 and 10, the reviewed accounts cover four episodes on three dates, not four incident days or sixteen distinct ships. This continues the pressure flagged on September 10; CGA’s interpretation of planned harassment remains an attributed claim without independent corroboration.
sourcevia cga_islands - 2026-09-11 — 2026-09-12Matsucivilian_transportattributed reportNew Taima cancellation confirmed; Langqi service plans to resume新臺馬輪確認停航,琅岐航線預定復航
The operator confirms that the September 11 outbound and September 12 return New Taima voyage is cancelled because of rough seas, resolving yesterday’s provisional notice. A September 12 evening sailing is expected but remains subject to the September 12 announcement. Separately, the Fuao–Langqi operator announces resumption from September 12 after assessing sea conditions as safe. These are route-specific operator plans, not independently verified completed sailings or evidence of military restrictions.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-10KinmenCoast guardofficial claimCoast Guard reports a third Kinmen episode this week海巡署通報本週第三次金門限制水域事件
Taiwan’s Coast Guard says four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen restricted waters on September 10 and all left after its response. It describes this as the week’s third episode and says the frequency has increased. Together with its two September 8 accounts, the reviewed evidence covers three episodes on two dates, not three incident days or twelve distinct vessels. The repetition warrants closer attention, but the frequency assessment remains attributed to CGA and lacks independent corroboration; no mainland buildup is established.
sourcevia cga_islands - Announced exercise dates:2026-09-09/10,15–18,21–24Taiwanmaritime_restrictionofficial claimTaiwan maritime notice lists planned exercise-water restrictions台灣航船布告列示預定演訓水域限制
The Maritime and Port Bureau’s September 11 notice cites an August 10 Taiwan Navy Headquarters letter and prohibits vessels from entering designated exercise waters on September 9–10,15–18 and21–24. This is a Taiwan-issued planned exercise notice, not a newly announced PRC closure. The English heading says southwestern waters while the attachment label refers to southeastern areas; exact boundaries and hours were not extracted, so use the original notice and attachments for navigation.
sourcevia taiwan_mpb - 2026-09-09 — 2026-09-12Matsucivilian_transportattributed reportRough seas cancel several Matsu ferry services海象不佳造成多條馬祖航線停航
Operator notices confirm cancellation of the September 9–10 and 10–11 New Taima round trips. They also announce September 11 cancellation of the Fuao–Langqi service and September 11–12 Nanbei Star 2 sailings; Taima Star cannot provide the advertised short-route support. All cite sea conditions. The September 11 evening New Taima departure is only provisionally doubtful, pending a September 11 announcement. These are route-specific announced weather disruptions, not evidence of military closure or complete isolation of Matsu.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-13 publications; exercise date unknownMainlandDoctrine / capacityderived analysisCivilian-resource doctrine and amphibious training remain capacity context民用資源作戰概念與兩棲訓練仍屬能力脈絡
ISW interprets PLA discussions of civilian resources as future wartime requirements. Its linked September 13 PLA Daily original discusses replacing damaged military functions with civilian resources; this is doctrine, not a mobilization order. The linked CCTV amphibious-training page is dated September 8, although ISW describes a September 13 video. The text reports amphibious live-fire assessment but does not give a dated coastal concentration, force total or validated airlift increase. Video-specific drone claims were not independently verified. Keep publication dates distinct from unknown exercise dates.
sourcevia isw - 2026-09-08KinmenCoast guardofficial claimCoast Guard reports two Kinmen entries involving the same four ships海巡署通報同四艘海警船一日兩度進入金門限制水域
Taiwan’s Coast Guard reports morning and afternoon entries into Kinmen restricted waters by the same four Chinese coast guard ships on September 8, with all leaving after its response. The afternoon notice updates the morning report: this is one daily record covering two reported episodes, not eight distinct vessels or four incidents from mirrored pages. These are attributed official claims without independent corroboration. The record does not by itself establish a sustained increase or mainland force concentration.
sourcevia cga_islands - 2026-09-08/2026-09-10Matsucivilian_transportattributed reportMatsu notices revise ferry service for sea conditions and maintenance馬祖公告因海象與保養調整船班
September 8 transport notices revise September 9–10 Nangan–Dongyin service: the original ferry is scheduled to resume September 9 as seas ease, with a substitute planned September 10 because of poor sea conditions. A separate notice identifies September 8 maintenance and says a possible September 9 evening cancellation remains subject to confirmation. These are published plans, not verified completed sailings or blanket island isolation. The stated causes are sea conditions and maintenance, not military restrictions.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-09-07Dongsha (Pratas)Coast guardofficial claimCoast Guard reports a Chinese government-vessel entry near Dongsha海巡署通報中國海警船進入東沙限制水域
Taiwan’s Coast Guard says a China Coast Guard ship entered Dongsha’s restricted waters on September 7. Its notice described a confrontation at publication; a later outcome has not been verified. The agency also reported 12 expulsions of Chinese coast guard vessels from Dongsha waters during 2026 to date. That is its cumulative figure, not this database’s independent incident count. This is an attributed official report, not independently corroborated evidence of mainland force massing.
sourcevia cga_dongsha - ≤ 2026-09-06Mainlandground_force_capabilityofficial claimState broadcaster describes earlier artillery acceptance training in Anhui中國官媒報導較早在安徽舉行的新裝備射擊考核
A September 6 CNR Military report says a 71st Group Army brigade conducted live-fire assessment with newly received 155mm self-propelled artillery at a training ground in eastern Anhui. The exercise date and equipment count are not stated. A September 9 SCMP article frames the upgrade as Taiwan-facing firepower, citing state media. The primary written account supports an equipment-and-training report in Anhui; it does not establish a current concentration on the Fujian coast, new amphibious deployment, or military-airlift increase. Independent corroboration is absent.
sourcevia cnr_military - 2026-09-03TaiwanCoast guardofficial claimBackfill: Coast Guard disputes a claimed enforcement patrol east of Taiwan補錄:海巡署反駁台灣東部海域執法巡查說法
A Taiwan Coast Guard clarification describes two Chinese coast guard ships east of Green Island on September 3 and disputes China’s description of an enforcement patrol. The body dates the activity to September 3; the retrieved page shows a September 8 update while RSS carries September 3, so the original publication date remains unverified. This is a historical official account added today, not a new September 8 event or evidence of a territorial-water entry. The underlying PRC statement has not been independently reviewed.
sourcevia cga_islands - 2026-09-01/2026-09-02MainlandDoctrine / capacityderived analysisPublished analysis discusses unmanned amphibious systems and AI doctrine公開分析討論無人兩棲系統與人工智慧作戰概念
ISW’s September 4 update analyzes September 1–2 PLA Daily writing about unmanned amphibious systems and AI in future warfare. This records published doctrine and analyst interpretation. It supplies neither a deployed inventory nor evidence that forces are currently massing opposite Taiwan. The original PLA Daily articles have not been independently reviewed for this record.
- 2026-08-31Mainlandamphibious_airlift_capacityattributed reportAnnual assessment discusses landing and transport capability development年度評估討論登陸與運輸能力發展
Taipei Times reports analyst Chieh Chung’s reading of Taiwan MND’s annual China military-power report, submitted August 31. He highlights helicopter transport, amphibious vessels and logistics development. The article also says landing capabilities remain inadequate at this stage. These are attributed assessments of development programs; the underlying report has not been obtained for this record. They do not demonstrate a new coastal troop concentration or a measured rise in military-airlift flights.
- 2026-08-29KinmenCoast guardofficial claimFour China Coast Guard ships reported in Kinmen restricted waters海巡署通報四艘中國海警船進入金門限制水域
Taiwan’s Coast Guard said four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen’s restricted waters and later left following its response. This is the Taiwan agency’s account; independent corroboration has not been added to this record.
sourcevia cga_islands - 2026-08-28Mainlandmobilization_capacityattributed reportISW reviews mobilization-law changes affecting civilian capacityISW 分析動員法修訂與民用資源能力
ISW reports an August 28 revision to China’s National Defense Mobilization Law, effective October 1, and assesses possible implications for civilian sealift, drones and other technology. An official promulgation notice retrieved through search supports the adoption and effective dates; the linked NPC full text was unavailable for direct review. The broader legal interpretation remains attributed to ISW. This is a change in a legal framework, not evidence that requisition, mobilization, a transport surge or force concentration is occurring.
sourcevia isw - 2026-08-08/2026-08-10Matsucivilian_transportattributed reportMatsu transport notice attributes schedule changes to a typhoon馬祖交通公告指出颱風造成船班異動
Matsu Daily relayed the county transport bureau’s notice of maritime schedule changes for August 8–10 because of an approaching typhoon. Retained as a weather-context example; this record is not evidence of military mobilization.
sourcevia matsu_transport - 2026-08-04 to 2026-09-04TaiwanCoast guardattributed reportRetrospective: recurring coast guard patrols east of Taiwan回顧:台灣東部海域海警持續輪替巡查
ISW reports roughly monthly two-ship coast guard rotations east of Taiwan, most recently September 4, using Starboard data. It interprets the pattern as normalization of a persistent presence. Xinhua separately attributes an August 10–31 seabed survey to the natural-resources ministry. ISW could not independently verify the reported militia escort. This is retrospective context, not a newly observed September 13 deployment or a confirmed blockade.
sourcevia isw - 2026-08; source dates may use event-day alignmentTaiwanhistorical_monthly_analysisderived analysisAugust snapshot provides retrospective context, with unresolved count differences八月海峽快照提供回顧脈絡,數值差異尚待釐清
TSM describes lower August air activity alongside continuing maritime pressure, citing MND and CGA. It reports 171 sorties and 7.7 daily naval detections; this monitor retains 176 sorties and 7.81 for reporting windows ending August 1–31. Shifting those windows one day gives 173 and 7.65, so date alignment alone does not fully resolve the difference. TSM also inconsistently describes 171 as tied with March while giving March as 173, and calls the 11-sortie patrol one of the two largest days despite listing a 20-sortie day. Preserve both accounts; do not overwrite primary daily records. This is August context, not independent confirmation of a September buildup.
sourcevia tsm - 2026-08Taiwananalysisderived analysisAugust arms-delivery review separates expected arrivals from verified delivery八月軍售交付回顧區分預期抵達與已確認交付
Taiwan Security Monitor’s August review discusses reported procurement and delivery progress. It explicitly leaves the new F-16 aircraft outside its in-delivery category because arrival in Taiwan was not verified for that month. Retained as historical logistics context, not a September 8 delivery confirmation or a count of PLA military-airlift flights. The original linked delivery reports have not been independently reviewed here.
sourcevia tsm - 2026-07-31/2026-09-18Mainlandstrategic_contextderived analysisNew update adds strategic context, not a verified buildup新報告補充戰略脈絡,未證實兵力集結
ISW discusses Taiwan’s September 16–18 defensive exercises, retrospective AI misuse and ship construction. Taiwan’s exercises overlap the September 18 reviewed record, not a new PLA drill. ISW also discusses PRC exit/entry rules effective September 15; the July 31 official summary confirms the effective date, but is not an airspace closure, ferry suspension or mobilization order. No current mainland ground-force concentration or measured airlift increase is established by these articles.
sourcevia isw - 2026-07Taiwananalysisderived analysisJuly review separates air activity, naval presence and Coast Guard pressure七月回顧分別分析空中活動、海軍存在與海警壓力
Taiwan Security Monitor reports 260 PLA aerial sorties in July and describes weather-related interruptions. Its daily air and naval series uses Taiwan MND releases, so it is contextual analysis rather than independent confirmation of those counts. The report covers July, not current force posture.
sourcevia tsm - 2026-05 — 2026-07Taiwancivilian_survey_capacityattributed reportPublished analysis of earlier civilian survey activity較早民用調查船活動的公開分析
Peter Dutton and Ryan Martinson analyze civilian research-vessel operations around Taiwan in May–July 2026, including historical AIS-based mapping. They argue that the surveys may support military oceanography and political pressure, while acknowledging that individual survey purposes are difficult to establish. This is retrospective expert interpretation, not a September 10 deployment report, corroborated ground-force concentration, or evidence of military-airlift growth. Underlying ship movements and inferred intent have not been independently verified by this monitor.
sourcevia wotr - 2025-12/2026-08Mainlandcapability_researchattributed reportRetrospective report describes suspected military-linked AI misuse回溯報告描述疑與軍事研究相關的AI濫用
Anthropic reports disrupting a China-based researcher’s use of its tools for electronic-warfare software, including a Taiwan simulation. The company assesses institutional links from account metadata and content. The report covers December 2025–August 2026; it does not establish an operational deployment, current troop concentration or increased airlift. ISW’s September 18 discussion relies on this same report.
sourcevia anthropic - 2022-08-31Mainlandamphibious_capacityhistorical reportingHistorical evidence: civilian ferries used in amphibious training歷史證據:民用渡輪用於兩棲演訓
USNI News reported satellite imagery showing civilian ferries participating in amphibious training in 2022. It illustrates a capacity indicator worth reviewing over time; it does not establish a present-day buildup across the Strait.
sourcevia usni - Event dates unspecified; ten-year retrospectiveMainlandlogistics_capabilityofficial claimPLA retrospective describes logistics reforms and transport exercises解放軍回顧文章描述後勤改革及運輸演訓
PLA Daily’s September20 retrospective claims improved joint logistics, transport data-sharing and rail/sea loading exercises. Examples lack event dates and locations sufficient to establish a new concentration opposite Taiwan. Transport support for Air Force units does not itself measure military-airlift sorties. These are official capability and exercise claims, not independently verified current deployments.
sourcevia pla_daily - Undated: autumn / recentlyMainlandamphibious_ground_trainingofficial claimNew publications describe hovercraft and northern-theater rail training新刊內容描述氣墊艇及北部戰區鐵路訓練
September19 PLA publications describe hovercraft well-deck training and a Northern Theater Army unit’s cross-region rail transport training. The first says autumn and the second recently; neither provides a precise observation date or a demonstrated deployment toward Taiwan. No troop concentration, amphibious lift increase or airlift trend can be quantified from these captions and descriptions.
sourcevia pla_daily - Early autumn; precise exercise date unspecifiedMainlandamphibious_trainingofficial claimPLA Daily describes amphibious ship–hovercraft training解放軍報描述兩棲艦與氣墊艇協同訓練
A September 17 PLA Daily report describes early-autumn amphibious assault ship and hovercraft training in an unspecified East China Sea area, including repeated launch, unloading and recovery. It supplies no precise observation date, overall force total or corroborated evidence of staging opposite Taiwan. Treat it as an attributed exercise account and transport-capability practice. A Ministry of Defense repost is the same underlying report, not another corroborating source.
sourcevia pla_daily
Sources, and whether each answered
| Source | Status | Latest publication | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| MND index | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain |
| MND index | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain |
| MND daily report | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain |
| MND daily report | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain |
| MND daily report | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain |
| cga_fleet | stale · 52 d | 2026-07-30 | First response empty; retry restored the same July30 stale feed. Islands RSS and homepage remained available. |
| cga_islands | ok | 2026-09-20 | |
| tsm | ok | 2026-09-16 | |
| usni | ok | 2026-09-19 | |
| cga_home | ok | — | |
| prc_eastern_theater | failed | — | curl: (60) SSL: no alternative certificate subject name matches target host name 'www.mod.gov.cn' |
| mnd | ok | 2026-09-20 | Daily series current via manually reviewed official fallback; primary collector still fails TLS. |
| mnd_primary_tls | failed | — | Certificate-chain verification failed; TLS verification not bypassed. Known since September19. |
| mnd_official_fallback | ok | 2026-09-20 | Manual review. Same MND claim, not independent observations; mirror end-date error explicitly retained. |
Taiwan Ministry of National Defense (automated): Primary official claims; not independently verified. · Taiwan Coast Guard · Kinmen, Matsu, Penghu (discovery): Taiwan official account; copied reports do not add independent corroboration. · George Mason University · Taiwan Security Monitor (discovery): Daily air/naval counts derived from Taiwan MND; do not count as independent confirmation. · USNI News (discovery): Specialist reporting; record imagery date separately from publication date. · CSIS / ChinaPower (review): Distinguish scenarios and analysis from observed events. · PRC Ministry of National Defense · Eastern Theater (discovery): PRC official claims; independent corroboration required for conclusions. · US–China Economic and Security Review Commission (review): Capability development is not evidence that forces are currently massing. · Taiwan CAA / Air Navigation and Weather Services (review): Civilian traffic, military airlift and weather cancellations are separate indicators. · Matsu Daily · transport announcements (review): A transport disruption is not automatically military-related. · PRC Maritime Safety Administration (review): A warning can announce an exercise; it does not itself establish invasion preparation. · Taipei Times · attributed defense reporting (review): Secondary reporting and named analyst interpretation are not independent verification of deployments. · Institute for the Study of War · China & Taiwan (review): Trace underlying sources; analysis of PLA publications does not establish deployed capability. · Taiwan Coast Guard · Dongsha / Pratas (discovery): Mirrored pages and press reports quoting CGA are one underlying official source. · War on the Rocks · attributed expert analysis (review): Author analysis; underlying sources and AIS not independently replicated by this monitor. · CNR Military · Chinese state broadcaster (review): State-broadcaster account is not independent confirmation; equipment upgrades do not establish current mobilization. · PLA Daily / China Military Online (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Taiwan Maritime and Port Bureau · notices to mariners (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Central News Agency · attributed defense reporting (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Anthropic · published threat research (review): Attribution is not independent corroboration; derivative coverage shares the underlying source. · Naval News · published capability analysis (review): Attribution is not independent corroboration; derivative coverage shares the underlying source.
Documented travel
- 鄭麗文 Cheng Li-Wun2026-04-10 · Beijing · BeijingKMT chair’s mainland visit and Xi meetingsource →
- 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2026-01-01 – 2026-01-04 · Fujian · FuzhouMatsu Small Three Links 25th-anniversary visitsource →
- 蔣萬安 Chiang Wan-An2025-12-28 · Elsewhere in mainland China · ShanghaiTaipei delegation at 2025 Shanghai forumsource →
- 林奕華 Lin Yi-Hua2025-12-28 · Elsewhere in mainland China · ShanghaiTaipei delegation at 2025 Shanghai forumsource →
- 廖先翔 Liao Hsien Hsiang2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 林倩綺 Lin Chien-Chi2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 林沛祥 Lin Pei-Hsiang2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 翁曉玲 Weng Hsiao-Ling2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 邱鎮軍 Chiu Cheng-Chun2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 盧縣一 Lu Hsien-Yi2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 黃仁 Huang Jen2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 游顥 Yu Hao2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 張智倫 Chang Chih-Lun2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 徐欣瑩 Hsu Hsin-Ying2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 王鴻薇 Wang Hung Wei2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 羅明才 Lo Ming-Tsai2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 鄭正鈐 Cheng Cheng-Chien2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 鄭天財Sra Kacaw Jeng Tian-Tsair2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 傅崐萁 Fu Kun-Chi2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 陳雪生 Chen Hsuen-Sheng2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 陳玉珍 Chen Yu-Jen2024-04-26 · Beijing · BeijingSeventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland Chinasource →
- 蔣萬安 Chiang Wan-An2023-08-29 – 2023-08-31 · Elsewhere in mainland China · ShanghaiTaipei mayor’s Shanghai City Forum delegationsource →
- 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2023-05-16 – 2023-05-19 · Fujian · FuzhouFuzhou–Matsu consultations and 518 investment fairsource →
- 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2023-04-01 – 2023-04-03 · Fujian · FuzhouSmall Three Links shipping and tourism visitsource →
- 陳福海 Chen Fu-hai2023-01-29 · Fujian · XiamenKinmen leaders return from Song Tao meetingsource →
- 陳玉珍 Chen Yu-Jen2023-01-29 · Fujian · XiamenKinmen leaders return from Song Tao meetingsource →
Sitting members · 79 district, 34 party-list and overseas
A party-list member holds no local constituency and is never given one. A member with no ballots is not an absent member — the Legislative Yuan's President presides rather than voting in roll calls.
| Member | Constituency | Party | Ballots | Committees | Topics w/ evidence | Trips | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 張嘉郡 CHANG CHIA-CHUN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,210 | 5 | 3 | — | 46806 |
| 張宏陸 CHANG HUNG LU | 新北市第6選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,263 | 5 | 2 | — | 46802 |
| 張智倫 ChangChih-Lun | 新北市第8選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,233 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 46804 |
| 陳超明 CHEN CHAO MING | 苗栗縣第1選舉區 | 無黨籍 | 1,156 | 5 | 2 | — | 46822 |
| 陳秀寳 CHEN HSIU-PAO | 彰化縣第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,261 | 5 | 2 | — | 46814 |
| 陳冠廷 Chen Kuan-Ting | 嘉義縣第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 791 | 5 | 3 | — | 46817 |
| 陳亭妃 CHEN TING-FEI | 臺南市第3選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,179 | 7 | 2 | — | 46815 |
| 陳永康 CHEN YEONG-KANG | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,249 | 7 | 2 | — | 46812 |
| 陳瑩 Chen Ying | 平地原住民選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,236 | 5 | 2 | — | 46823 |
| 陳菁徽 ChenChing-Hui | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,242 | 9 | 2 | — | 46821 |
| 陳清龍 CHENCHING-Lung | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 193 | 1 | — | — | 56458 |
| 陳昭姿 ChenGau-Tzu | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 705 | 5 | 2 | — | 46755 |
| 鄭正鈐 ChengCheng-Chien | 新竹市選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,242 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46845 |
| 陳雪生 CHENHSUEN-SHENG | 連江縣選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,148 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46820 |
| 陳培瑜 CHENPEI-YU | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,210 | 13 | 2 | — | 46819 |
| 陳素月 ChenSu-Yueh | 彰化縣第4選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,232 | 5 | 2 | — | 46818 |
| 陳玉珍 ChenYu-Jen | 金門縣選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,191 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 46813 |
| 鍾佳濱 CHIA-PIN CHUNG | 屏東縣第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,246 | 7 | 2 | — | 46853 |
| 江啟臣 CHIANG CHI-CHEN | 臺中市第8選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 32 | 5 | — | — | 46764 |
| 邱志偉 CHIU CHIH-WEI | 高雄市第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,221 | 5 | 2 | — | 46788 |
| 邱慧洳 CHIU HUI-JU | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 185 | 1 | — | — | 56438 |
| 邱若華 Chiu Jo-Hua | 桃園市第6選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,243 | 5 | 2 | — | 46789 |
| 邱議瑩 Chiu Yi Ying | 高雄市第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,207 | 5 | 2 | — | 46791 |
| 邱鎮軍 CHIUCHENG-CHUN | 苗栗縣第2選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,246 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46790 |
| 莊瑞雄 ChuangJui-Hsiung | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,235 | 11 | 2 | — | 46807 |
| 陳俊宇 CHUN YU CHEN | 宜蘭縣選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,251 | 5 | 2 | — | 46816 |
| 林岱樺 Daihua Lin | 高雄市第4選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,235 | 5 | 2 | — | 46780 |
| 傅崐萁 FU KUN-CHI | 花蓮縣選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,234 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 46824 |
| 何欣純 HO HSIN-CHUN | 臺中市第7選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,217 | 5 | 2 | — | 46765 |
| 謝龍介 HSIEH LUNG-CHIEH | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,237 | 5 | 2 | — | 46852 |
| 謝衣鳯 HSIEH YI-FONG | 彰化縣第3選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,184 | 10 | 1 | — | 46851 |
| 許忠信 Hsu Chung-Hsin | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 125 | 2 | — | — | 56585 |
| 徐欣瑩 Hsu Hsin-Ying | 新竹縣第1選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,249 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46797 |
| 徐巧芯 HSUCHIAO-HSIN | 臺北市第7選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,249 | 7 | 2 | — | 46796 |
| 許智傑 HSUCHIH-CHIEH | 高雄市第7選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,246 | 5 | 1 | — | 46809 |
| 徐富癸 HSUFU-KUEI | 屏東縣第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,258 | 5 | 2 | — | 46798 |
| 許宇甄 HsuYuChen | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,241 | 14 | 2 | — | 46808 |
| 黃仁 Huang Jen | 平地原住民選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,244 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 46827 |
| 黃健豪 HUANG CHIEN HAO | 臺中市第5選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,224 | 7 | 2 | — | 46831 |
| 黃建賓 Huang Chien-Pin | 臺東縣選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,241 | 5 | 2 | — | 46829 |
| 黃捷 Huang Jie | 高雄市第6選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,260 | 5 | 2 | — | 46833 |
| 黃秀芳 HUANG SHIOU-FANG | 彰化縣第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,252 | 5 | 2 | — | 46828 |
| 洪孟楷 HungMong-Kai | 新北市第1選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,190 | 6 | 3 | — | 46794 |
| 洪毓祥 HUNGYU-SHIANG | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 187 | 1 | — | — | 56378 |
| 鄭天財Sra Kacaw Jeng Tian-Tsair | 平地原住民選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,249 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 46844 |
| 高金素梅 KAO CHIN SU-MEI | 山地原住民選舉區 | 無黨籍 | 972 | 5 | 2 | — | 46801 |
| 柯建銘 KERCHIEN-MING | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 633 | 7 | 2 | — | 46793 |
| 柯志恩 Ko Chih-En | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 712 | 5 | 2 | — | 46792 |
| 葛如鈞 KO JU-CHUN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 709 | 13 | 2 | — | 46838 |
| 郭國文 Kuo Kuo-Wen | 臺南市第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,204 | 5 | 2 | — | 46811 |
| 郭昱晴 Kuo Yu Ching | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 777 | 15 | 2 | — | 46810 |
| 韓國瑜 Kuo-Yu Han | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | — | 5 | — | — | 46854 |
| 賴惠員 LAI HUI-YUAN | 臺南市第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,220 | 10 | 2 | — | 46849 |
| 賴瑞隆 Lai Jui-Lung | 高雄市第8選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,245 | 7 | 2 | — | 46850 |
| 賴士葆 Lai Shyh-Bao | 臺北市第8選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,234 | 7 | 2 | — | 46848 |
| 李坤城 LEE KUEN-CHENG | 新北市第3選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,250 | 7 | 2 | — | 46863 |
| 李柏毅 Lee Po Yi | 高雄市第3選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,229 | 5 | 2 | — | 46774 |
| 李彥秀 LEE YEN HSIU | 臺北市第4選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 770 | 5 | 2 | — | 46773 |
| 李昆澤 LeeKun-Tse | 高雄市第5選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,250 | 5 | 2 | — | 46772 |
| 廖先翔 LIAO Hsien Hsiang | 新北市第12選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,240 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 46839 |
| 廖偉翔 LIAOWEI-HSIANG | 臺中市第4選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,240 | 7 | 2 | — | 46840 |
| 林沛祥 LIN PEI-HSIANG | 基隆市選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,245 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 46778 |
| 林倩綺 Lin Chien-Chi | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,234 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 46783 |
| 林楚茵 LIN CHU YIN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,228 | 10 | 2 | — | 46786 |
| 林俊憲 Lin Chun-Hsien | 臺南市第5選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,238 | 5 | 2 | — | 46781 |
| 林淑芬 Lin Shu-Fen | 新北市第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,186 | 5 | 2 | — | 46785 |
| 林德福 LIN TE FU | 新北市第9選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,239 | 5 | 2 | — | 46787 |
| 林月琴 LIN YUEH CHIN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,262 | 14 | 2 | — | 46777 |
| 林宜瑾 LINI-CHIN | 臺南市第4選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,178 | 5 | 2 | — | 46779 |
| 林思銘 LINSZU-MING | 新竹縣第2選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,222 | 9 | 2 | — | 46782 |
| 劉建國 Liu Chien-Kuo | 雲林縣第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,223 | 5 | 2 | — | 46841 |
| 劉書彬 LiuShu-Pin | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 485 | 6 | 2 | — | 77699 |
| 羅智強 LO CHIH CHIANG | 臺北市第6選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,250 | 9 | 2 | — | 46859 |
| 羅美玲 LohMeei-Ling | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,232 | 8 | 2 | — | 46858 |
| 羅明才 Loming-tsai | 新北市第11選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,245 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46857 |
| 盧縣一 LU Hsien-Yi | 山地原住民選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,234 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 46847 |
| 魯明哲 Lu Ming-Che | 桃園市第3選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,215 | 5 | 2 | — | 46846 |
| 呂玉玲 LUYU-LING | 桃園市第5選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,217 | 5 | 2 | — | 46862 |
| 馬文君 MaWen-Chun | 南投縣第1選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,241 | 5 | 2 | — | 46800 |
| 張雅琳 Ngalim Tiunn | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,254 | 10 | 2 | — | 46805 |
| 牛煦庭 NIU,Hsu-Ting | 桃園市第1選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,250 | 7 | 2 | — | 46757 |
| 沈發惠 SHENFA-HUI | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,258 | 12 | 2 | — | 46776 |
| 沈伯洋 SHENPAO-YANG | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,192 | 14 | 2 | — | 46775 |
| 蘇清泉 SU CHING CHUAN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,244 | 5 | 2 | — | 46861 |
| 蘇巧慧 SuChiao-Hui | 新北市第5選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,235 | 5 | 2 | — | 46860 |
| 羅廷瑋 Ting-Wei Lo | 臺中市第6選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,237 | 8 | 2 | — | 46856 |
| 丁學忠 TINGHsueh-Chung | 雲林縣第1選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,195 | 5 | 2 | — | 46752 |
| 蔡其昌 TSAI CHI-CHANG | 臺中市第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 690 | 5 | 2 | — | 46842 |
| 蔡春綢 TSAI CHUN-CHOU | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 188 | 3 | — | — | 56398 |
| 蔡易餘 TSAI YI-YU | 嘉義縣第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,190 | 7 | 2 | — | 46843 |
| 涂權吉 Tu Chuan-Chi | 桃園市第2選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,240 | 8 | 2 | — | 46799 |
| 王鴻薇 wang hung wei | 臺北市第3選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,245 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 46762 |
| 王義川 WANG YI-CHUAN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,054 | 9 | 2 | — | 55855 |
| 王安祥 WangAn-Hsiang | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 台灣民眾黨 | 145 | 2 | — | — | 56418 |
| 王正旭 WANGCHENG-HSU | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,255 | 8 | 2 | — | 55030 |
| 王美惠 WangMei-Hui | 嘉義市選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,258 | 7 | 2 | — | 46761 |
| 王世堅 WANGSHIH-CHIEN | 臺北市第2選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,211 | 5 | 2 | — | 46758 |
| 王定宇 WANGTING-YU | 臺南市第6選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 672 | 5 | 2 | — | 46760 |
| 萬美玲 WanMei-Ling | 桃園市第4選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,172 | 5 | 2 | — | 46836 |
| 翁曉玲 Weng Hsiao-Ling | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,243 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 46754 |
| 吳琪銘 wuchi-ming | 新北市第10選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,242 | 5 | 2 | — | 46771 |
| 伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe WuLi-Hua | 山地原住民選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,253 | 7 | 2 | — | 46763 |
| 吳沛憶 WUPEI-YI | 臺北市第5選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,214 | 5 | 2 | — | 46766 |
| 吳秉叡 WuPing-Jui | 新北市第4選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,258 | 5 | 2 | — | 46768 |
| 吳思瑤 WuSzu-Yao | 臺北市第1選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 1,211 | 7 | 2 | — | 46769 |
| 吳宗憲 WuTsung-Hsien | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,178 | 9 | 2 | — | 46767 |
| 楊曜 Yang Yao | 澎湖縣選舉區 | 民主進步黨 | 837 | 5 | 2 | — | 46834 |
| 楊瓊瓔 YANGCHIUNG-YING | 臺中市第3選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,239 | 5 | 4 | — | 46835 |
| 葉元之 YEH YUAN-CHIH | 新北市第7選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,237 | 7 | 2 | — | 46837 |
| 顏寬恒 Yen Kuan Heng | 臺中市第2選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,235 | 5 | 5 | — | 46855 |
| 游顥 YU HAO | 南投縣第2選舉區 | 中國國民黨 | 1,222 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 46826 |
| 王育敏 YU MIN WANG | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 中國國民黨 | 1,243 | 6 | 2 | — | 46759 |
| 范雲 Yun FAN | 全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district | 民主進步黨 | 1,235 | 11 | 2 | — | 46795 |
Departed this term · 10
- 游錫堃 You Si-Kun全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 民主進步黨2024-02-02 · 辭職
- 洪申翰 HUNGSUN-HAN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 民主進步黨2024-11-25 · 辭職
- 吳春城 WUCHUN-CHENG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2025-02-27 · 辭職
- 林國成 LinKuo-Chen全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 林憶君 LINYI-CHUN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 張啓楷 CHANG CHI-KAI全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 麥玉珍 MAIYU-CHEN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 黃珊珊 HuangShan Shan全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 黃國昌 HUANGKUO-CHANG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-02-01 · 辭職
- 李貞秀 LiChen-Hsiu全國不分區及僑居國外國民 · 台灣民眾黨2026-04-13 · 開除黨籍
County and city heads · 22
Office status is tracked separately from who was elected: 宜蘭縣 — 林姿妙 suspended 2024-12-31; 宜蘭縣 — 林茂盛 appointed_acting 2024-12-31; 新竹市 — 高虹安 resumed_duties 2025-12-18; 澎湖縣 — 林皆興 observed_acting .
| County / city | Head | Office | Verification | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 連江縣 09007 | 王忠銘 | 縣長 | government_newspaper_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register | 2026-09-05 |
| 金門縣 09020 | 陳福海 | 縣長 | indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register | 2022-12-30 |
| 宜蘭縣 10002 | 林茂盛 | 代理縣長 | acting_profile_correction · acting_override_required | 2024-12-31 |
| 新竹縣 10004 | 楊文科 | 縣長 | indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register | |
| 苗栗縣 10005 | 鍾東錦 | 縣長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2022-12-25 |
| 彰化縣 10007 | 王惠美 | 縣長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | |
| 南投縣 10008 | 許淑華 | 縣長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2023-01-04 |
| 雲林縣 10009 | 張麗善 | 縣長 | indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register | 2018-12-27 |
| 嘉義縣 10010 | 翁章梁 | 縣長 | official_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register | 2026-08-07 |
| 屏東縣 10013 | 周春米 | 縣長 | reviewed_profile_excerpt_full_body_unavailable · matches the ministry register | |
| 臺東縣 10014 | 饒慶鈴 | 縣長 | official_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register | 2026-08-21 |
| 花蓮縣 10015 | 徐榛蔚 | 縣長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | |
| 澎湖縣 10016 | 林皆興 | 代理縣長 | acting_documented_current_endpoint_unavailable · acting_override_required · status hold | 2026-07-08 |
| 基隆市 10017 | 謝國樑 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2022-12-29 |
| 新竹市 10018 | 高虹安 | 市長 | restored_current_activity_confirmed · matches the ministry register | 2026-09-07 |
| 嘉義市 10020 | 黃敏惠 | 市長 | web_profile_http_fetch_failed · matches the ministry register | |
| 臺北市 63000 | 蔣萬安 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2024-09-26 |
| 高雄市 64000 | 陳其邁 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | |
| 新北市 65000 | 侯友宜 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | |
| 臺中市 66000 | 盧秀燕 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2026-08-07 |
| 臺南市 67000 | 黃偉哲 | 市長 | live_profile · matches the ministry register | 2023-06-02 |
| 桃園市 68000 | 張善政 | 市長 | indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register |
22 counties and cities carry their official codes in the atlas; the map layer is not built here yet. “Topics with evidence” counts the tracked topics on which a reviewed individual record exists — a blank means no reviewed evidence was found, not that the member holds no position.