← Flashpoints

Taiwan

The 11th Legislative Yuan as its own publisher records it: 113 sitting members and 10 who have left, 130,806 individual ballots, and 22 county and city heads. Certified against the live publisher on 2026-09-07; travel and geography as of 2026-09-07.

Where these facts come from. Every roster field is the publisher’s own, joined by its own person identifier — the regional atlas contributed only the documented travel below and the county geometry. The two agreed on all 123 members with 0 disagreements before either was used. What the travel figure is: 26 trips involving 22 people — trips found in the sources read, never a record of who travelled. A meeting, trip or commercial relationship establishes nothing about allegiance, control or intent.
Public-source security monitor · separate from the roster

Strait Watch

PAUSEDlast run 2026-09-20 12:06 UTC · latest observation 2026-09-20 · latest review 2026-09-20 · snapshot 2026-09-21
Collection is paused. The owner stopped the daily run on 2026-09-21; nothing below updates until it is resumed. The latest data is for 2026-09-20.
What this is. A daily public-source monitor of PLA and coast-guard activity around Taiwan, collected on the owner's machine outside Cartevoir and snapshotted into this page. Collection is paused (the owner stopped the daily run on 2026-09-21); this is a dated snapshot and does not update. What it is not. Published official aggregates and discovered publications. Primary official claims, not independently verified; no live unit tracks. Published aggregates only. Daily series is not a complete picture of force posture; no live unit tracks. Sorties are not unique aircraft; a daily ship count is not a fleet census.

PLA activity around Taiwan, as the Ministry of National Defense reports it daily

2026-07-23 → 2026-09-20 · 60 days
0max 29
aircraft sorties PLAN shipslatest (2026-09-20): 5 sorties, 11 ships, 6 official ships, 5 crossed the median line or entered the ADIZ · central, southwestern, eastern · MND report
Aircraft: seven-day mean 14.1 against the prior 28 days’ 4.6, ratio 3.09· review prompt (uncalibrated; not an alarm)
Ships: seven-day mean 8.3 against the prior 28 days’ 7.3, ratio 1.14
Official ships: seven-day mean 2.7 against the prior 28 days’ 4.7, ratio 0.58
Last alert the monitor raised: Sustained short-term aircraft rise across September14–18:4→8→15→19→28, with official joint-patrol context. Naval counts below baseline; no invasion or buildup inference.

Reviewed evidence · 41

Each record is the monitor’s own bilingual summary of a source it read, with the source linked. A repeated report of the same episode is not a second episode.

  1. 2026-09-20/2026-09-22Matsucivilian_transportofficial claim
    Matsu notices schedule evening and inter-island services
    馬祖公告排定夜航及島際航班

    September20 notices schedule New Taima and Taima Star evening sailings, following yesterday’s provisional outlook. A separate notice schedules Nangan–Dongyin service on September21–22. September21 evening service remains subject to weather and the following morning’s decision. These notices establish scheduled availability, not completed voyages; no military closure is stated.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  2. 2026-09-19T06:00:00+08:00/2026-09-20T06:00:00+08:00Taiwandaily_aggregate_followupofficial claim
    Aircraft sorties fall again; naval count steady for a second day
    共機架次再降;共艦數連兩日持平

    MND reports 5 aircraft sorties, 11 naval vessels and 6 other official ships, with all 5 sorties in its median-line/ADIZ subset. Aircraft fell 28→20→5 over three reporting days; naval vessels stayed at 11 for two days and other official ships rose 3→6. These figures do not measure airlift, unique fleets or territorial-airspace violations. Direct MND TLS failure continues. Official mirrors confirm counts; the Air Force end date is misprinted as September18, while the main MND indexed original and September20 MNA item support the September19–20 window.

    sourcevia mnd
  3. 2026-09-19/2026-09-20Matsucivilian_transportofficial claim
    Matsu ferry scheduled; next-day service subject to weather
    馬祖客輪排定開航;翌日航班仍須視天候確認

    The September 19 notice schedules New Taima service between Keelung, Nangan and Dongyin. September 20 evening service is provisionally expected, subject to the next morning’s announcement and changing sea conditions. A timetable is not confirmation the voyage operated. No military restriction is stated in this notice.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  4. 2026-09-18T06:00:00+08:00/2026-09-19T06:00:00+08:00Taiwandaily_aggregate_followupofficial claim
    Aircraft count eases; one-day naval increase
    共機架次回落;共艦單日增加

    MND reports 20 aircraft sorties, 11 naval ships and 3 other official ships; 13 sorties in the median-line/ADIZ subset. Aircraft fell from 28; naval ships rose from 7. This follows the September 18 alert, with no new sustained naval increase established. Direct MND collection failed TLS. Official Air Force and MNA fallback pages confirm counts; MND indexed original resolves the Air Force mirror’s duplicated September 18 end date. These are the same official claim, not independent detections or territorial-airspace violations.

    sourcevia mnd
  5. 2026-09-18/2026-09-20 scheduled serviceMatsucivilian_transportattributed report
    September 18 Matsu sailing announced; weekend service scheduled
    九月十八日馬祖航班公告開航,週末短程班表發布

    The operator notice carried by Matsu Daily confirms a scheduled New Taima departure from Keelung at 22:30 on September 18, resolving yesterday’s provisional decision. Nanbei Star 2 is scheduled for Nangan–Dongyin on September 19 and the return on September 20. September 19 evening long-route service remains provisional until that morning’s announcement. Announced schedules do not prove completed voyages; these notices do not attribute disruptions to military action.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  6. 2026-09-18 visit; construction proposed for 2028–2032Matsucapacity_planofficial claim
    Matsu Coast Guard facility proposal is future capacity
    馬祖海巡廳舍規劃屬未來建設

    CGA reports the premier’s September 18 Matsu visit to review a proposed NT$735 million coast-patrol/Fuao inspection facility. Approval is expected in 2026, construction in 2028 and completion in 2032, with space for about 190 personnel. These are planned dates and capacity, not a current deployment increase. General references to Chinese Coast Guard pressure do not describe a new dated incursion.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  7. Three-day exercise ending2026-09-18; presidential visit2026-09-18Taiwantaiwan_exerciseattributed report
    Taiwan reports integrating attack drones into its joint live-fire exercise
    台灣通報將攻擊無人機納入聯合實彈演練

    CNA, citing a Presidential Office release, reports that President Lai inspected Taiwan’s three-day joint precision-missile exercise in Pingtung on September 18 and described the first integration of multiple attack-drone types. Record this as Taiwan training and attributed capability development. Its coincidence with rising PLA sorties does not establish causation or prove PRC mobilization; CNA and official material quoted within it are not independent corroboration.

    sourcevia cna
  8. 2026-09-17 from 08:45 UTC+8; end unspecifiedTaiwanjoint_patrolofficial claim
    MND reports a separate September 17 joint patrol after the daily cutoff
    國防部另通報九月十七日每日統計截止後的聯合警巡

    MND, through its Military News Agency, reports 19 aircraft sorties from 08:45 Taiwan time, including 15 crossing the median line into southwestern and central airspace in coordination with naval vessels. The mix includes combat, support and unmanned aircraft; Y-8 electronic-warfare aircraft are not an airlift count. This partial-day event follows the separate 24-hour report ending at 06:00 (19 sorties, 17 median-line/ADIZ subset). Keep the windows separate; do not add this event to the daily series or a later daily total. No territorial-airspace violation or mainland buildup is established.

    sourcevia mnd
  9. 2026-09-16/2026-09-18 scheduled services; tidal timetable changes through 2026-10-09Matsucivilian_transportattributed report
    Matsu ferry schedules resume; Langqi changes attributed to tides
    馬祖渡輪公告開航;琅岐時刻調整歸因潮汐

    Matsu Daily carries New Taima sailing notices for September 16 and 17 after earlier weather and maintenance disruption, plus Nanbei Star 2 service on September 17–18. These are schedules, not proof of completed voyages. The September 18 evening long route remains provisional pending that morning’s decision. Separate operator notices adjust Fuao–Langqi departures during September 16–30 and October 2–9 because low tidal water levels affect Langqi port; no military cause is stated. Exact revised times are in notice images and were not transcribed.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  10. 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-16Matsucivil_transportattributed report
    Matsu: Taima Star sailing announced; maintenance and weather remain separate
    馬祖:臺馬之星公告開航,保養與海象分列

    The September 15 notice schedules Taima Star’s evening departure from Keelung via Nangan and Dongyin back to Nangan, without a return to Keelung. This resolves the prior provisional sailing announcement, but does not verify a completed voyage. New Taima’s September 15 trip is suspended for maintenance; September 16 evening service is still provisional. Nangan–Daqiu’s September 16 service is cancelled for sea conditions. No military cause is stated.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  11. as of 2026-09-14Mainlandcapability_constructionattributed report
    Analyst identifies possible submarine-drone support ship under construction
    分析者研判在建船舶可能支援無人潛航器

    H I Sutton reports reviewing satellite images and interprets a ship under construction as a possible submarine-drone mothership. Its proposed role and capacity remain analyst assessments. Construction evidence does not establish operational readiness, deployment toward Taiwan or amphibious troop transport. ISW’s September 18 update repeats this assessment; this monitor has not independently analyzed the imagery.

    sourcevia naval_news
  12. Daily windows ending 2026-09-14/2026-09-18 at 06:00 UTC+8Taiwanaggregate_trendderived analysis
    Aircraft activity continues rising; maritime counts do not show the same increase
    共機活動持續增加;船艦數量未呈現同幅上升

    MND reports 28 aircraft sorties, 7 naval ships and 2 other official ships for the window ending September 18 at 06:00, including a 24-sortie median-line/ADIZ subset. Daily sorties rose 4→8→15→19→28 across five reporting dates. The seven-day mean is 12.29 against 4.68 in the preceding 28 days (2.63×); naval means are 6.71 versus 7.43. This warrants a notice of sustained short-term air activity, not an invasion forecast. Yesterday’s 19-sortie partial patrol falls inside this full-day window and is not added again. These are official detections, not unique aircraft, airlift totals or territorial-airspace violation counts.

    sourcevia mnd
  13. 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-16Matsucivil_transportattributed report
    Matsu: weather cancellation confirmed; substitute service announced
    馬祖:確認海象停航,另公告替代航班

    Operator notices confirm New Taima’s September 14 outbound and September 15 return are cancelled for sea conditions, resolving yesterday’s uncertainty. Nanbei Star 2’s September 15–16 trip is also cancelled. Donghai Mingzhu announces an added Nangan–Dongyin trip for September 14–15. September 15 New Taima maintenance is a separate cause; a possible Taima Star evening sailing remains provisional. Announcements do not prove completed voyages. No military cause is stated.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  14. 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-14Matsucivil_transportattributed report
    Matsu ferries: announced sailings and further sea-condition uncertainty
    馬祖航運:公告開航,後續仍受海象影響

    Matsu Daily carries notices for September 13 evening New Taima and Taima Star sailings, plus September 13–14 Nangan–Dongyin service. These are schedules, not confirmation of completed voyages. The September 14 evening long-distance service may be cancelled, pending that morning’s decision because of forecast sea conditions. Nangan–Daqiu is cancelled September 14 because tides hinder docking. No military cause is stated.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  15. 2026-09-11KinmenCoast guardofficial claim
    CGA reports another Kinmen episode, continuing the previously flagged pattern
    海巡再通報金門事件,延續先前關注的模式

    Taiwan’s Coast Guard says the same four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen restricted waters on September 11 and all subsequently left. It calls this the fourth episode of the week and the second consecutive day. Together with September 8 and 10, the reviewed accounts cover four episodes on three dates, not four incident days or sixteen distinct ships. This continues the pressure flagged on September 10; CGA’s interpretation of planned harassment remains an attributed claim without independent corroboration.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  16. 2026-09-11 — 2026-09-12Matsucivilian_transportattributed report
    New Taima cancellation confirmed; Langqi service plans to resume
    新臺馬輪確認停航,琅岐航線預定復航

    The operator confirms that the September 11 outbound and September 12 return New Taima voyage is cancelled because of rough seas, resolving yesterday’s provisional notice. A September 12 evening sailing is expected but remains subject to the September 12 announcement. Separately, the Fuao–Langqi operator announces resumption from September 12 after assessing sea conditions as safe. These are route-specific operator plans, not independently verified completed sailings or evidence of military restrictions.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  17. 2026-09-10KinmenCoast guardofficial claim
    Coast Guard reports a third Kinmen episode this week
    海巡署通報本週第三次金門限制水域事件

    Taiwan’s Coast Guard says four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen restricted waters on September 10 and all left after its response. It describes this as the week’s third episode and says the frequency has increased. Together with its two September 8 accounts, the reviewed evidence covers three episodes on two dates, not three incident days or twelve distinct vessels. The repetition warrants closer attention, but the frequency assessment remains attributed to CGA and lacks independent corroboration; no mainland buildup is established.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  18. Announced exercise dates:2026-09-09/10,15–18,21–24Taiwanmaritime_restrictionofficial claim
    Taiwan maritime notice lists planned exercise-water restrictions
    台灣航船布告列示預定演訓水域限制

    The Maritime and Port Bureau’s September 11 notice cites an August 10 Taiwan Navy Headquarters letter and prohibits vessels from entering designated exercise waters on September 9–10,15–18 and21–24. This is a Taiwan-issued planned exercise notice, not a newly announced PRC closure. The English heading says southwestern waters while the attachment label refers to southeastern areas; exact boundaries and hours were not extracted, so use the original notice and attachments for navigation.

    sourcevia taiwan_mpb
  19. 2026-09-09 — 2026-09-12Matsucivilian_transportattributed report
    Rough seas cancel several Matsu ferry services
    海象不佳造成多條馬祖航線停航

    Operator notices confirm cancellation of the September 9–10 and 10–11 New Taima round trips. They also announce September 11 cancellation of the Fuao–Langqi service and September 11–12 Nanbei Star 2 sailings; Taima Star cannot provide the advertised short-route support. All cite sea conditions. The September 11 evening New Taima departure is only provisionally doubtful, pending a September 11 announcement. These are route-specific announced weather disruptions, not evidence of military closure or complete isolation of Matsu.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  20. 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-13 publications; exercise date unknownMainlandDoctrine / capacityderived analysis
    Civilian-resource doctrine and amphibious training remain capacity context
    民用資源作戰概念與兩棲訓練仍屬能力脈絡

    ISW interprets PLA discussions of civilian resources as future wartime requirements. Its linked September 13 PLA Daily original discusses replacing damaged military functions with civilian resources; this is doctrine, not a mobilization order. The linked CCTV amphibious-training page is dated September 8, although ISW describes a September 13 video. The text reports amphibious live-fire assessment but does not give a dated coastal concentration, force total or validated airlift increase. Video-specific drone claims were not independently verified. Keep publication dates distinct from unknown exercise dates.

    sourcevia isw
  21. 2026-09-08KinmenCoast guardofficial claim
    Coast Guard reports two Kinmen entries involving the same four ships
    海巡署通報同四艘海警船一日兩度進入金門限制水域

    Taiwan’s Coast Guard reports morning and afternoon entries into Kinmen restricted waters by the same four Chinese coast guard ships on September 8, with all leaving after its response. The afternoon notice updates the morning report: this is one daily record covering two reported episodes, not eight distinct vessels or four incidents from mirrored pages. These are attributed official claims without independent corroboration. The record does not by itself establish a sustained increase or mainland force concentration.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  22. 2026-09-08/2026-09-10Matsucivilian_transportattributed report
    Matsu notices revise ferry service for sea conditions and maintenance
    馬祖公告因海象與保養調整船班

    September 8 transport notices revise September 9–10 Nangan–Dongyin service: the original ferry is scheduled to resume September 9 as seas ease, with a substitute planned September 10 because of poor sea conditions. A separate notice identifies September 8 maintenance and says a possible September 9 evening cancellation remains subject to confirmation. These are published plans, not verified completed sailings or blanket island isolation. The stated causes are sea conditions and maintenance, not military restrictions.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  23. 2026-09-07Dongsha (Pratas)Coast guardofficial claim
    Coast Guard reports a Chinese government-vessel entry near Dongsha
    海巡署通報中國海警船進入東沙限制水域

    Taiwan’s Coast Guard says a China Coast Guard ship entered Dongsha’s restricted waters on September 7. Its notice described a confrontation at publication; a later outcome has not been verified. The agency also reported 12 expulsions of Chinese coast guard vessels from Dongsha waters during 2026 to date. That is its cumulative figure, not this database’s independent incident count. This is an attributed official report, not independently corroborated evidence of mainland force massing.

    sourcevia cga_dongsha
  24. ≤ 2026-09-06Mainlandground_force_capabilityofficial claim
    State broadcaster describes earlier artillery acceptance training in Anhui
    中國官媒報導較早在安徽舉行的新裝備射擊考核

    A September 6 CNR Military report says a 71st Group Army brigade conducted live-fire assessment with newly received 155mm self-propelled artillery at a training ground in eastern Anhui. The exercise date and equipment count are not stated. A September 9 SCMP article frames the upgrade as Taiwan-facing firepower, citing state media. The primary written account supports an equipment-and-training report in Anhui; it does not establish a current concentration on the Fujian coast, new amphibious deployment, or military-airlift increase. Independent corroboration is absent.

    sourcevia cnr_military
  25. 2026-09-03TaiwanCoast guardofficial claim
    Backfill: Coast Guard disputes a claimed enforcement patrol east of Taiwan
    補錄:海巡署反駁台灣東部海域執法巡查說法

    A Taiwan Coast Guard clarification describes two Chinese coast guard ships east of Green Island on September 3 and disputes China’s description of an enforcement patrol. The body dates the activity to September 3; the retrieved page shows a September 8 update while RSS carries September 3, so the original publication date remains unverified. This is a historical official account added today, not a new September 8 event or evidence of a territorial-water entry. The underlying PRC statement has not been independently reviewed.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  26. 2026-09-01/2026-09-02MainlandDoctrine / capacityderived analysis
    Published analysis discusses unmanned amphibious systems and AI doctrine
    公開分析討論無人兩棲系統與人工智慧作戰概念

    ISW’s September 4 update analyzes September 1–2 PLA Daily writing about unmanned amphibious systems and AI in future warfare. This records published doctrine and analyst interpretation. It supplies neither a deployed inventory nor evidence that forces are currently massing opposite Taiwan. The original PLA Daily articles have not been independently reviewed for this record.

    sourcevia iswDates refer to publications analyzed, not observed military deployments.
  27. 2026-08-31Mainlandamphibious_airlift_capacityattributed report
    Annual assessment discusses landing and transport capability development
    年度評估討論登陸與運輸能力發展

    Taipei Times reports analyst Chieh Chung’s reading of Taiwan MND’s annual China military-power report, submitted August 31. He highlights helicopter transport, amphibious vessels and logistics development. The article also says landing capabilities remain inadequate at this stage. These are attributed assessments of development programs; the underlying report has not been obtained for this record. They do not demonstrate a new coastal troop concentration or a measured rise in military-airlift flights.

    sourcevia taipei_timesObservation date is report submission, not a deployment observation.
  28. 2026-08-29KinmenCoast guardofficial claim
    Four China Coast Guard ships reported in Kinmen restricted waters
    海巡署通報四艘中國海警船進入金門限制水域

    Taiwan’s Coast Guard said four Chinese coast guard ships entered Kinmen’s restricted waters and later left following its response. This is the Taiwan agency’s account; independent corroboration has not been added to this record.

    sourcevia cga_islands
  29. 2026-08-28Mainlandmobilization_capacityattributed report
    ISW reviews mobilization-law changes affecting civilian capacity
    ISW 分析動員法修訂與民用資源能力

    ISW reports an August 28 revision to China’s National Defense Mobilization Law, effective October 1, and assesses possible implications for civilian sealift, drones and other technology. An official promulgation notice retrieved through search supports the adoption and effective dates; the linked NPC full text was unavailable for direct review. The broader legal interpretation remains attributed to ISW. This is a change in a legal framework, not evidence that requisition, mobilization, a transport surge or force concentration is occurring.

    sourcevia isw
  30. 2026-08-08/2026-08-10Matsucivilian_transportattributed report
    Matsu transport notice attributes schedule changes to a typhoon
    馬祖交通公告指出颱風造成船班異動

    Matsu Daily relayed the county transport bureau’s notice of maritime schedule changes for August 8–10 because of an approaching typhoon. Retained as a weather-context example; this record is not evidence of military mobilization.

    sourcevia matsu_transport
  31. 2026-08-04 to 2026-09-04TaiwanCoast guardattributed report
    Retrospective: recurring coast guard patrols east of Taiwan
    回顧:台灣東部海域海警持續輪替巡查

    ISW reports roughly monthly two-ship coast guard rotations east of Taiwan, most recently September 4, using Starboard data. It interprets the pattern as normalization of a persistent presence. Xinhua separately attributes an August 10–31 seabed survey to the natural-resources ministry. ISW could not independently verify the reported militia escort. This is retrospective context, not a newly observed September 13 deployment or a confirmed blockade.

    sourcevia isw
  32. 2026-08; source dates may use event-day alignmentTaiwanhistorical_monthly_analysisderived analysis
    August snapshot provides retrospective context, with unresolved count differences
    八月海峽快照提供回顧脈絡,數值差異尚待釐清

    TSM describes lower August air activity alongside continuing maritime pressure, citing MND and CGA. It reports 171 sorties and 7.7 daily naval detections; this monitor retains 176 sorties and 7.81 for reporting windows ending August 1–31. Shifting those windows one day gives 173 and 7.65, so date alignment alone does not fully resolve the difference. TSM also inconsistently describes 171 as tied with March while giving March as 173, and calls the 11-sortie patrol one of the two largest days despite listing a 20-sortie day. Preserve both accounts; do not overwrite primary daily records. This is August context, not independent confirmation of a September buildup.

    sourcevia tsm
  33. 2026-08Taiwananalysisderived analysis
    August arms-delivery review separates expected arrivals from verified delivery
    八月軍售交付回顧區分預期抵達與已確認交付

    Taiwan Security Monitor’s August review discusses reported procurement and delivery progress. It explicitly leaves the new F-16 aircraft outside its in-delivery category because arrival in Taiwan was not verified for that month. Retained as historical logistics context, not a September 8 delivery confirmation or a count of PLA military-airlift flights. The original linked delivery reports have not been independently reviewed here.

    sourcevia tsm
  34. 2026-07-31/2026-09-18Mainlandstrategic_contextderived analysis
    New update adds strategic context, not a verified buildup
    新報告補充戰略脈絡,未證實兵力集結

    ISW discusses Taiwan’s September 16–18 defensive exercises, retrospective AI misuse and ship construction. Taiwan’s exercises overlap the September 18 reviewed record, not a new PLA drill. ISW also discusses PRC exit/entry rules effective September 15; the July 31 official summary confirms the effective date, but is not an airspace closure, ferry suspension or mobilization order. No current mainland ground-force concentration or measured airlift increase is established by these articles.

    sourcevia isw
  35. 2026-07Taiwananalysisderived analysis
    July review separates air activity, naval presence and Coast Guard pressure
    七月回顧分別分析空中活動、海軍存在與海警壓力

    Taiwan Security Monitor reports 260 PLA aerial sorties in July and describes weather-related interruptions. Its daily air and naval series uses Taiwan MND releases, so it is contextual analysis rather than independent confirmation of those counts. The report covers July, not current force posture.

    sourcevia tsm
  36. 2026-05 — 2026-07Taiwancivilian_survey_capacityattributed report
    Published analysis of earlier civilian survey activity
    較早民用調查船活動的公開分析

    Peter Dutton and Ryan Martinson analyze civilian research-vessel operations around Taiwan in May–July 2026, including historical AIS-based mapping. They argue that the surveys may support military oceanography and political pressure, while acknowledging that individual survey purposes are difficult to establish. This is retrospective expert interpretation, not a September 10 deployment report, corroborated ground-force concentration, or evidence of military-airlift growth. Underlying ship movements and inferred intent have not been independently verified by this monitor.

    sourcevia wotr
  37. 2025-12/2026-08Mainlandcapability_researchattributed report
    Retrospective report describes suspected military-linked AI misuse
    回溯報告描述疑與軍事研究相關的AI濫用

    Anthropic reports disrupting a China-based researcher’s use of its tools for electronic-warfare software, including a Taiwan simulation. The company assesses institutional links from account metadata and content. The report covers December 2025–August 2026; it does not establish an operational deployment, current troop concentration or increased airlift. ISW’s September 18 discussion relies on this same report.

    sourcevia anthropic
  38. 2022-08-31Mainlandamphibious_capacityhistorical reporting
    Historical evidence: civilian ferries used in amphibious training
    歷史證據:民用渡輪用於兩棲演訓

    USNI News reported satellite imagery showing civilian ferries participating in amphibious training in 2022. It illustrates a capacity indicator worth reviewing over time; it does not establish a present-day buildup across the Strait.

    sourcevia usni
  39. Event dates unspecified; ten-year retrospectiveMainlandlogistics_capabilityofficial claim
    PLA retrospective describes logistics reforms and transport exercises
    解放軍回顧文章描述後勤改革及運輸演訓

    PLA Daily’s September20 retrospective claims improved joint logistics, transport data-sharing and rail/sea loading exercises. Examples lack event dates and locations sufficient to establish a new concentration opposite Taiwan. Transport support for Air Force units does not itself measure military-airlift sorties. These are official capability and exercise claims, not independently verified current deployments.

    sourcevia pla_daily
  40. Undated: autumn / recentlyMainlandamphibious_ground_trainingofficial claim
    New publications describe hovercraft and northern-theater rail training
    新刊內容描述氣墊艇及北部戰區鐵路訓練

    September19 PLA publications describe hovercraft well-deck training and a Northern Theater Army unit’s cross-region rail transport training. The first says autumn and the second recently; neither provides a precise observation date or a demonstrated deployment toward Taiwan. No troop concentration, amphibious lift increase or airlift trend can be quantified from these captions and descriptions.

    sourcevia pla_daily
  41. Early autumn; precise exercise date unspecifiedMainlandamphibious_trainingofficial claim
    PLA Daily describes amphibious ship–hovercraft training
    解放軍報描述兩棲艦與氣墊艇協同訓練

    A September 17 PLA Daily report describes early-autumn amphibious assault ship and hovercraft training in an unspecified East China Sea area, including repeated launch, unloading and recovery. It supplies no precise observation date, overall force total or corroborated evidence of staging opposite Taiwan. Treat it as an attributed exercise account and transport-capability practice. A Ministry of Defense repost is the same underlying report, not another corroborating source.

    sourcevia pla_daily

Sources, and whether each answered

SourceStatusLatest publicationNote
MND indexfailed—curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain
MND indexfailed—curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain
MND daily reportfailed—curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain
MND daily reportfailed—curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain
MND daily reportfailed—curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain
cga_fleetstale · 52 d2026-07-30First response empty; retry restored the same July30 stale feed. Islands RSS and homepage remained available.
cga_islandsok2026-09-20
tsmok2026-09-16
usniok2026-09-19
cga_homeok—
prc_eastern_theaterfailed—curl: (60) SSL: no alternative certificate subject name matches target host name 'www.mod.gov.cn'
mndok2026-09-20Daily series current via manually reviewed official fallback; primary collector still fails TLS.
mnd_primary_tlsfailed—Certificate-chain verification failed; TLS verification not bypassed. Known since September19.
mnd_official_fallbackok2026-09-20Manual review. Same MND claim, not independent observations; mirror end-date error explicitly retained.

Taiwan Ministry of National Defense (automated): Primary official claims; not independently verified. · Taiwan Coast Guard · Kinmen, Matsu, Penghu (discovery): Taiwan official account; copied reports do not add independent corroboration. · George Mason University · Taiwan Security Monitor (discovery): Daily air/naval counts derived from Taiwan MND; do not count as independent confirmation. · USNI News (discovery): Specialist reporting; record imagery date separately from publication date. · CSIS / ChinaPower (review): Distinguish scenarios and analysis from observed events. · PRC Ministry of National Defense · Eastern Theater (discovery): PRC official claims; independent corroboration required for conclusions. · US–China Economic and Security Review Commission (review): Capability development is not evidence that forces are currently massing. · Taiwan CAA / Air Navigation and Weather Services (review): Civilian traffic, military airlift and weather cancellations are separate indicators. · Matsu Daily · transport announcements (review): A transport disruption is not automatically military-related. · PRC Maritime Safety Administration (review): A warning can announce an exercise; it does not itself establish invasion preparation. · Taipei Times · attributed defense reporting (review): Secondary reporting and named analyst interpretation are not independent verification of deployments. · Institute for the Study of War · China & Taiwan (review): Trace underlying sources; analysis of PLA publications does not establish deployed capability. · Taiwan Coast Guard · Dongsha / Pratas (discovery): Mirrored pages and press reports quoting CGA are one underlying official source. · War on the Rocks · attributed expert analysis (review): Author analysis; underlying sources and AIS not independently replicated by this monitor. · CNR Military · Chinese state broadcaster (review): State-broadcaster account is not independent confirmation; equipment upgrades do not establish current mobilization. · PLA Daily / China Military Online (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Taiwan Maritime and Port Bureau · notices to mariners (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Central News Agency · attributed defense reporting (review): Attribute source claims; republications and quoted official releases are not independent corroboration. · Anthropic · published threat research (review): Attribution is not independent corroboration; derivative coverage shares the underlying source. · Naval News · published capability analysis (review): Attribution is not independent corroboration; derivative coverage shares the underlying source.

Documented travel

Beijing · 18Fujian · 5Elsewhere in mainland China · 3
  1. 鄭麗文 Cheng Li-Wun2026-04-10 · Beijing · Beijing
    KMT chair’s mainland visit and Xi meeting
    source →
  2. 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2026-01-01 – 2026-01-04 · Fujian · Fuzhou
    Matsu Small Three Links 25th-anniversary visit
    source →
  3. 蔣萬安 Chiang Wan-An2025-12-28 · Elsewhere in mainland China · Shanghai
    Taipei delegation at 2025 Shanghai forum
    source →
  4. 林奕華 Lin Yi-Hua2025-12-28 · Elsewhere in mainland China · Shanghai
    Taipei delegation at 2025 Shanghai forum
    source →
  5. 廖先翔 Liao Hsien Hsiang2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  6. 林倩綺 Lin Chien-Chi2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  7. 林沛祥 Lin Pei-Hsiang2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  8. 翁曉玲 Weng Hsiao-Ling2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  9. 邱鎮軍 Chiu Cheng-Chun2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  10. 盧縣一 Lu Hsien-Yi2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  11. 黃仁 Huang Jen2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  12. 游顥 Yu Hao2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  13. 張智倫 Chang Chih-Lun2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  14. 徐欣瑩 Hsu Hsin-Ying2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  15. 王鴻薇 Wang Hung Wei2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  16. 羅明才 Lo Ming-Tsai2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  17. 鄭正鈐 Cheng Cheng-Chien2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  18. 鄭天財Sra Kacaw Jeng Tian-Tsair2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  19. 傅崐萁 Fu Kun-Chi2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  20. 陳雪生 Chen Hsuen-Sheng2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  21. 陳玉珍 Chen Yu-Jen2024-04-26 · Beijing · Beijing
    Seventeen KMT legislators travel to mainland China
    source →
  22. 蔣萬安 Chiang Wan-An2023-08-29 – 2023-08-31 · Elsewhere in mainland China · Shanghai
    Taipei mayor’s Shanghai City Forum delegation
    source →
  23. 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2023-05-16 – 2023-05-19 · Fujian · Fuzhou
    Fuzhou–Matsu consultations and 518 investment fair
    source →
  24. 王忠銘 Wang Chung-ming2023-04-01 – 2023-04-03 · Fujian · Fuzhou
    Small Three Links shipping and tourism visit
    source →
  25. 陳福海 Chen Fu-hai2023-01-29 · Fujian · Xiamen
    Kinmen leaders return from Song Tao meeting
    source →
  26. 陳玉珍 Chen Yu-Jen2023-01-29 · Fujian · Xiamen
    Kinmen leaders return from Song Tao meeting
    source →

Sitting members · 79 district, 34 party-list and overseas

A party-list member holds no local constituency and is never given one. A member with no ballots is not an absent member — the Legislative Yuan's President presides rather than voting in roll calls.

MemberConstituencyPartyBallotsCommitteesTopics w/ evidenceTripsProfile
張嘉郡 CHANG CHIA-CHUN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,21053—46806
張宏陸 CHANG HUNG LU新北市第6選舉區民主進步黨1,26352—46802
張智倫 ChangChih-Lun新北市第8選舉區中國國民黨1,23372146804
陳超明 CHEN CHAO MING苗栗縣第1選舉區無黨籍1,15652—46822
陳秀寳 CHEN HSIU-PAO彰化縣第1選舉區民主進步黨1,26152—46814
陳冠廷 Chen Kuan-Ting嘉義縣第2選舉區民主進步黨79153—46817
陳亭妃 CHEN TING-FEI臺南市第3選舉區民主進步黨1,17972—46815
陳永康 CHEN YEONG-KANG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,24972—46812
陳瑩 Chen Ying平地原住民選舉區民主進步黨1,23652—46823
陳菁徽 ChenChing-Hui全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,24292—46821
陳清龍 CHENCHING-Lung全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1931——56458
陳昭姿 ChenGau-Tzu全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨70552—46755
鄭正鈐 ChengCheng-Chien新竹市選舉區中國國民黨1,24252146845
陳雪生 CHENHSUEN-SHENG連江縣選舉區中國國民黨1,14852146820
陳培瑜 CHENPEI-YU全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,210132—46819
陳素月 ChenSu-Yueh彰化縣第4選舉區民主進步黨1,23252—46818
陳玉珍 ChenYu-Jen金門縣選舉區中國國民黨1,19182246813
鍾佳濱 CHIA-PIN CHUNG屏東縣第1選舉區民主進步黨1,24672—46853
江啟臣 CHIANG CHI-CHEN臺中市第8選舉區中國國民黨325——46764
邱志偉 CHIU CHIH-WEI高雄市第2選舉區民主進步黨1,22152—46788
邱慧洳 CHIU HUI-JU全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1851——56438
邱若華 Chiu Jo-Hua桃園市第6選舉區中國國民黨1,24352—46789
邱議瑩 Chiu Yi Ying高雄市第1選舉區民主進步黨1,20752—46791
邱鎮軍 CHIUCHENG-CHUN苗栗縣第2選舉區中國國民黨1,24652146790
莊瑞雄 ChuangJui-Hsiung全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,235112—46807
陳俊宇 CHUN YU CHEN宜蘭縣選舉區民主進步黨1,25152—46816
林岱樺 Daihua Lin高雄市第4選舉區民主進步黨1,23552—46780
傅崐萁 FU KUN-CHI花蓮縣選舉區中國國民黨1,23472146824
何欣純 HO HSIN-CHUN臺中市第7選舉區民主進步黨1,21752—46765
謝龍介 HSIEH LUNG-CHIEH全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,23752—46852
謝衣鳯 HSIEH YI-FONG彰化縣第3選舉區中國國民黨1,184101—46851
許忠信 Hsu Chung-Hsin全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1252——56585
徐欣瑩 Hsu Hsin-Ying新竹縣第1選舉區中國國民黨1,24952146797
徐巧芯 HSUCHIAO-HSIN臺北市第7選舉區中國國民黨1,24972—46796
許智傑 HSUCHIH-CHIEH高雄市第7選舉區民主進步黨1,24651—46809
徐富癸 HSUFU-KUEI屏東縣第2選舉區民主進步黨1,25852—46798
許宇甄 HsuYuChen全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,241142—46808
黃仁 Huang Jen平地原住民選舉區中國國民黨1,24462146827
黃健豪 HUANG CHIEN HAO臺中市第5選舉區中國國民黨1,22472—46831
黃建賓 Huang Chien-Pin臺東縣選舉區中國國民黨1,24152—46829
黃捷 Huang Jie高雄市第6選舉區民主進步黨1,26052—46833
黃秀芳 HUANG SHIOU-FANG彰化縣第2選舉區民主進步黨1,25252—46828
洪孟楷 HungMong-Kai新北市第1選舉區中國國民黨1,19063—46794
洪毓祥 HUNGYU-SHIANG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1871——56378
鄭天財Sra Kacaw Jeng Tian-Tsair平地原住民選舉區中國國民黨1,24982146844
高金素梅 KAO CHIN SU-MEI山地原住民選舉區無黨籍97252—46801
柯建銘 KERCHIEN-MING全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨63372—46793
柯志恩 Ko Chih-En全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨71252—46792
葛如鈞 KO JU-CHUN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨709132—46838
郭國文 Kuo Kuo-Wen臺南市第2選舉區民主進步黨1,20452—46811
郭昱晴 Kuo Yu Ching全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨777152—46810
韓國瑜 Kuo-Yu Han全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨—5——46854
賴惠員 LAI HUI-YUAN臺南市第1選舉區民主進步黨1,220102—46849
賴瑞隆 Lai Jui-Lung高雄市第8選舉區民主進步黨1,24572—46850
賴士葆 Lai Shyh-Bao臺北市第8選舉區中國國民黨1,23472—46848
李坤城 LEE KUEN-CHENG新北市第3選舉區民主進步黨1,25072—46863
李柏毅 Lee Po Yi高雄市第3選舉區民主進步黨1,22952—46774
李彥秀 LEE YEN HSIU臺北市第4選舉區中國國民黨77052—46773
李昆澤 LeeKun-Tse高雄市第5選舉區民主進步黨1,25052—46772
廖先翔 LIAO Hsien Hsiang新北市第12選舉區中國國民黨1,24092146839
廖偉翔 LIAOWEI-HSIANG臺中市第4選舉區中國國民黨1,24072—46840
林沛祥 LIN PEI-HSIANG基隆市選舉區中國國民黨1,24592146778
林倩綺 Lin Chien-Chi全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,234162146783
林楚茵 LIN CHU YIN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,228102—46786
林俊憲 Lin Chun-Hsien臺南市第5選舉區民主進步黨1,23852—46781
林淑芬 Lin Shu-Fen新北市第2選舉區民主進步黨1,18652—46785
林德福 LIN TE FU新北市第9選舉區中國國民黨1,23952—46787
林月琴 LIN YUEH CHIN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,262142—46777
林宜瑾 LINI-CHIN臺南市第4選舉區民主進步黨1,17852—46779
林思銘 LINSZU-MING新竹縣第2選舉區中國國民黨1,22292—46782
劉建國 Liu Chien-Kuo雲林縣第2選舉區民主進步黨1,22352—46841
劉書彬 LiuShu-Pin全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨48562—77699
羅智強 LO CHIH CHIANG臺北市第6選舉區中國國民黨1,25092—46859
羅美玲 LohMeei-Ling全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,23282—46858
羅明才 Loming-tsai新北市第11選舉區中國國民黨1,24552146857
盧縣一 LU Hsien-Yi山地原住民選舉區中國國民黨1,23482146847
魯明哲 Lu Ming-Che桃園市第3選舉區中國國民黨1,21552—46846
呂玉玲 LUYU-LING桃園市第5選舉區中國國民黨1,21752—46862
馬文君 MaWen-Chun南投縣第1選舉區中國國民黨1,24152—46800
張雅琳 Ngalim Tiunn全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,254102—46805
牛煦庭 NIU,Hsu-Ting桃園市第1選舉區中國國民黨1,25072—46757
沈發惠 SHENFA-HUI全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,258122—46776
沈伯洋 SHENPAO-YANG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,192142—46775
蘇清泉 SU CHING CHUAN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,24452—46861
蘇巧慧 SuChiao-Hui新北市第5選舉區民主進步黨1,23552—46860
羅廷瑋 Ting-Wei Lo臺中市第6選舉區中國國民黨1,23782—46856
丁學忠 TINGHsueh-Chung雲林縣第1選舉區中國國民黨1,19552—46752
蔡其昌 TSAI CHI-CHANG臺中市第1選舉區民主進步黨69052—46842
蔡春綢 TSAI CHUN-CHOU全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1883——56398
蔡易餘 TSAI YI-YU嘉義縣第1選舉區民主進步黨1,19072—46843
涂權吉 Tu Chuan-Chi桃園市第2選舉區中國國民黨1,24082—46799
王鴻薇 wang hung wei臺北市第3選舉區中國國民黨1,24572146762
王義川 WANG YI-CHUAN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,05492—55855
王安祥 WangAn-Hsiang全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district台灣民眾黨1452——56418
王正旭 WANGCHENG-HSU全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,25582—55030
王美惠 WangMei-Hui嘉義市選舉區民主進步黨1,25872—46761
王世堅 WANGSHIH-CHIEN臺北市第2選舉區民主進步黨1,21152—46758
王定宇 WANGTING-YU臺南市第6選舉區民主進步黨67252—46760
萬美玲 WanMei-Ling桃園市第4選舉區中國國民黨1,17252—46836
翁曉玲 Weng Hsiao-Ling全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,243132146754
吳琪銘 wuchi-ming新北市第10選舉區民主進步黨1,24252—46771
伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe WuLi-Hua山地原住民選舉區民主進步黨1,25372—46763
吳沛憶 WUPEI-YI臺北市第5選舉區民主進步黨1,21452—46766
吳秉叡 WuPing-Jui新北市第4選舉區民主進步黨1,25852—46768
吳思瑤 WuSzu-Yao臺北市第1選舉區民主進步黨1,21172—46769
吳宗憲 WuTsung-Hsien全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,17892—46767
楊曜 Yang Yao澎湖縣選舉區民主進步黨83752—46834
楊瓊瓔 YANGCHIUNG-YING臺中市第3選舉區中國國民黨1,23954—46835
葉元之 YEH YUAN-CHIH新北市第7選舉區中國國民黨1,23772—46837
顏寬恒 Yen Kuan Heng臺中市第2選舉區中國國民黨1,23555—46855
游顥 YU HAO南投縣第2選舉區中國國民黨1,22252146826
王育敏 YU MIN WANG全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district中國國民黨1,24362—46759
范雲 Yun FAN全國不分區及僑居國外國民 — no district民主進步黨1,235112—46795

Departed this term · 10

County and city heads · 22

Office status is tracked separately from who was elected: 宜蘭縣 — 林姿妙 suspended 2024-12-31; 宜蘭縣 — 林茂盛 appointed_acting 2024-12-31; 新竹市 — 高虹安 resumed_duties 2025-12-18; 澎湖縣 — 林皆興 observed_acting .

County / cityHeadOfficeVerificationAs of
連江縣 09007王忠銘縣長government_newspaper_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register2026-09-05
金門縣 09020陳福海縣長indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register2022-12-30
宜蘭縣 10002林茂盛代理縣長acting_profile_correction · acting_override_required2024-12-31
新竹縣 10004楊文科縣長indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register
苗栗縣 10005鍾東錦縣長live_profile · matches the ministry register2022-12-25
彰化縣 10007王惠美縣長live_profile · matches the ministry register
南投縣 10008許淑華縣長live_profile · matches the ministry register2023-01-04
雲林縣 10009張麗善縣長indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register2018-12-27
嘉義縣 10010翁章梁縣長official_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register2026-08-07
屏東縣 10013周春米縣長reviewed_profile_excerpt_full_body_unavailable · matches the ministry register
臺東縣 10014饒慶鈴縣長official_activity_profile_unavailable · matches the ministry register2026-08-21
花蓮縣 10015徐榛蔚縣長live_profile · matches the ministry register
澎湖縣 10016林皆興代理縣長acting_documented_current_endpoint_unavailable · acting_override_required · status hold2026-07-08
基隆市 10017謝國樑市長live_profile · matches the ministry register2022-12-29
新竹市 10018高虹安市長restored_current_activity_confirmed · matches the ministry register2026-09-07
嘉義市 10020黃敏惠市長web_profile_http_fetch_failed · matches the ministry register
臺北市 63000蔣萬安市長live_profile · matches the ministry register2024-09-26
高雄市 64000陳其邁市長live_profile · matches the ministry register
新北市 65000侯友宜市長live_profile · matches the ministry register
臺中市 66000盧秀燕市長live_profile · matches the ministry register2026-08-07
臺南市 67000黃偉哲市長live_profile · matches the ministry register2023-06-02
桃園市 68000張善政市長indexed_profile_live_fetch_blocked · matches the ministry register

22 counties and cities carry their official codes in the atlas; the map layer is not built here yet. “Topics with evidence” counts the tracked topics on which a reviewed individual record exists — a blank means no reviewed evidence was found, not that the member holds no position.